Saturday, March 30, 2013

A633.1.2.RB - Shuck, Allison

Leadership Gap

Over the years, I have worked for many different types of leaders and as a result, I have developed a strong opinion/attitude about leadership and what it takes to be an effective leader. Much like Lau Tzu, I believe that an effective leader is a person whom people hardly see; a type of leader who allows people to manage themselves, rather than be managed. This kind of leadership gives people the ability to make their own decisions, develop their own leadership skills and become effective leaders themselves. I know what you’re thinking; all the world needs is more leaders, but much to your surprise, creating effective leaders has become the norm in today’s society.


The old concept of respecting ones elders has decreased significantly over the years. In the past, we were under the assumption that our elders were more capable than us, based on their knowledge and experience as leaders thus, we followed them happily. Now, due to the explosion of leadership development courses, seminars and books, the new generation has left the older generation behind. However, ‘the depth of deference’ has lead to equality, making leaders both young and old accountable for their actions. This trend has allowed leadership to emerge from anarchy and oligarchy to polyarchy; transitioning from roughly no leadership to a world of many leaders.   

Obolensky 2010, states that "only those leaders who understand polyarchy will survive". Why you might ask, because the polyarchy approach to leadership attempts to outline the complexities of leadership in an effort to define the gap between old and new leadership styles. Polyarchy leadership represents a deeper, hitherto hidden shift of change in leadership practices conducted today; shifting from traditional leadership to leadership that encompasses both deterministic and non-deterministic leadership styles. The reason why polyarchy leadership is so successfully is because it involves understanding the context, limitations structures and dynamics of both anarchy and oligarchy leadership.